Mastering Git Merge Strategies for Clean and Manageable Projects

As developers, we’re often faced with choices that will impact the readability and manageability of our code repositories. Among the pivotal decisions is how we integrate branches in Git. The merge strategy we pick can mean the difference between a tangled web of commits and a sleek, navigable history. Today, we’re demystifying the three key strategies: Merge Commit, Squash, and Fast Forward.

Merge Commit: Capturing the Full Picture

When to use: When your team values a comprehensive historical context.

The git merge --no-ff command creates a merge commit regardless of whether the feature branch is ahead of the base branch. It’s perfect when you want to maintain a record of all the feature branch commits and the fact that a merge occurred.

Why it matters: Each feature branch retains its timeline, providing a granular look at the project’s evolution. This is beneficial for post-mortem reviews, audit trails, and understanding the journey of a feature.

How it works:

git checkout develop
git merge --no-ff feature-7
git push origin develop

Squash: Keeping It Clean

When to use: When your priority is a streamlined and clean commit history in your base branch.

Squashing via git merge --squash compresses all changes from the feature branch into a single commit. Once merged, it looks as if only one commit has been made to the base branch.

Why it matters: This approach avoids clutter, especially if the feature branch has a series of rapid, small commits. It’s ideal when the journey isn’t as important as the destination, focusing on the final state rather than the incremental changes.

How it works:

git checkout develop
git merge --squash feature-7
git commit -m "Integrated feature-7 feature with a squash merge."
git push origin develop

Also check:

Git : What is Git

Fast Forward: Linear and Simple

When to use: When the feature branch has a straight path of progression from the base branch.

Executing git merge --ff-only will simply move the base branch tip up to the feature branch tip, but only if there are no new commits on the base branch that the feature branch doesn’t have.

Why it matters: Fast forward merges are clean and straightforward. They work well when you’re working alone or when it’s clear that the feature branch’s changes don’t need to be highlighted separately.

How it works:

git checkout develop
git merge --ff-only feature-7
git push origin develop

Also check

Manage your code using GitHub

Making the Choice

Your project’s workflow and team’s preferences typically dictate which strategy to use. Some teams opt for a mix, leveraging the strengths of each method. Merge commits for significant features, squash for bug fixes or minor updates, and fast forwards for quick, linear features.

Practical Use Case: Pushing feature-7 to Develop

Imagine you’re working on feature branch feature-7, and it’s time to merge your work into the develop branch. But there’s a hitch – the pull request indicates conflicts that prevent a direct merge on the repository hosting service (like GitHub, GitLab, etc.).

Here’s how you can resolve this and push feature-7 to develop:

1. First, pull the latest changes from develop and resolve any conflicts locally:
   • git checkout feature-7
   • git pull origin develop
   • # Manually resolve conflicts in your code editor
   • git add .
   • git commit -m "Resolved conflicts with develop."
2. After ensuring feature-7 is up-to-date with develop, choose a merge strategy based on your team’s preferences and the context of the changes.
3. Finally, push your now up-to-date feature-7 branch:
   • git push origin EC-7
4. Now, the pull request should be mergeable using your chosen strategy.

Remember, each merge strategy serves a purpose based on your team’s workflow and the importance of preserving commit history. Merge with insight and clarity to keep your repository clean and comprehensible.

How to remove untracked files in git

The Takeaway

The beauty of Git is its flexibility, and with great power comes great responsibility. Whether you’re a solo developer or part of a large team, choosing the right merge strategy is crucial for maintaining an understandable commit history, which in turn keeps your project’s health in check.

Embrace the power of Git to make your project’s history work for you – not against you. Whichever strategy you choose, remember: consistency is key to a manageable repository.

---

Happy coding, merging, and may your commit trees always be manageable!

Reference:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5308816/how-can-i-merge-multiple-commits-onto-another-branch-as-a-single-squashed-commit

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29673869/what-is-git-fast-forwarding

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18584376/git-what-exactly-is-a-merge-commit-in-git